Sanders v. Bell

519 So. 2d 932, 1988 Ala. LEXIS 10, 1988 WL 8638
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJanuary 8, 1988
Docket86-1566
StatusPublished

This text of 519 So. 2d 932 (Sanders v. Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sanders v. Bell, 519 So. 2d 932, 1988 Ala. LEXIS 10, 1988 WL 8638 (Ala. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because it appears that the original complaint was timely filed and because the amendment merely corrected the name of the defendant as originally sued, the relation-back doctrine of Rule 15(c), A.R.Civ.P., is invoked. The trial court erred in granting the defendant’s motion to dismiss as to the defendant Curtis Ralph Bell. The judgment appealed from is reversed on the au- . thority of Rule 15(c), A.R.Civ.P., and McCulley v. Stroud, 286 Ala. 515, 243 So.2d 28 (1970).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

TORBERT, C.J., and JONES, SHORES, ADAMS and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McCulley v. Stroud
243 So. 2d 28 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
519 So. 2d 932, 1988 Ala. LEXIS 10, 1988 WL 8638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanders-v-bell-ala-1988.