Sanders v. Bassett
This text of Sanders v. Bassett (Sanders v. Bassett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7599
ANTHONY JESUS SANDERS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
KATHLEEN J. BASSETT; F.E. LOCKHART,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (CA-04-533-7)
Submitted: December 9, 2004 Decided: December 17, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Jesus Sanders, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Anthony Jesus Sanders appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Sanders v. Bassett, No. CA-04-533-7 (W.D. Va. filed Sept. 14, 2004
& entered Sept. 15, 2004). We deny Sanders’ motion to produce
documents for his review. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sanders v. Bassett, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanders-v-bassett-ca4-2004.