Sanders v. Bassett

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 17, 2004
Docket04-7599
StatusUnpublished

This text of Sanders v. Bassett (Sanders v. Bassett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sanders v. Bassett, (4th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7599

ANTHONY JESUS SANDERS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KATHLEEN J. BASSETT; F.E. LOCKHART,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (CA-04-533-7)

Submitted: December 9, 2004 Decided: December 17, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Jesus Sanders, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Anthony Jesus Sanders appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Sanders v. Bassett, No. CA-04-533-7 (W.D. Va. filed Sept. 14, 2004

& entered Sept. 15, 2004). We deny Sanders’ motion to produce

documents for his review. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Sanders v. Bassett, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanders-v-bassett-ca4-2004.