Sanders v. Bassett

Fourth Circuit

Sanders v. Bassett

115 F. App'x 159

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 17, 2004·No. No. 04-7599·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Jesus Sanders appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sanders v. Bassett, No. CA-04-533-7 (W.D.Va. filed Sept. 14, 2004 & entered Sept. 15, 2004). We deny Sanders’ motion to produce documents for his review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Jesus Sanders appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sanders v. Bassett, No. CA-04-533-7 (W.D.Va. filed Sept. 14, 2004 & entered Sept. 15, 2004). We deny Sanders’ motion to produce documents for his review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Sanders v. Bassett, 115 F. App'x 159 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

115 F. App'x 159 (Sanders v. Bassett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related