Sanders v. Andrews

Supreme Court of Georgia

Sanders v. Andrews

122 S.E. 192, 157 Ga. 799, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 253

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMarch 13, 1924

DocketNo. 3964

StatusPublished

This text of 122 S.E. 192 (Sanders v. Andrews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sanders v. Andrews, 122 S.E. 192, 157 Ga. 799, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 253 (Ga. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

1. Erom the record before us it' cannot be said that the note, which was reduced to judgment, contained a promise to pay usury; nor does it appear that in a suit on the note usury was pleaded.

2. The court did not err in finding against the claimant, and ordering the fi. fa. to proceed. Compare McLaws v. Moore, 83 Ga. 177 (2), 180 (9 S. E. 615), and authorities cited; Miller v. Parker, 133 Ga. 187 (65 S. E. 410). Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices coneur. S. P. Cain, for plaintiff in error. L. W. Rigsby,-J. S'. Weathers, and P. C. Andrews, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilbert, J.

1. Erom the record before us it' cannot be said that the note, which was reduced to judgment, contained a promise to pay usury; nor does it appear that in a suit on the note usury was pleaded.

2. The court did not err in finding against the claimant, and ordering the fi. fa. to proceed. Compare McLaws v. Moore, 83 Ga. 177 (2), 180 (9 S. E. 615), and authorities cited; Miller v. Parker, 133 Ga. 187 (65 S. E. 410). Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices coneur. S. P. Cain, for plaintiff in error. L. W. Rigsby,-J. S'. Weathers, and P. C. Andrews, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

122 S.E. 192, 157 Ga. 799, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanders-v-andrews-ga-1924.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack