Sanders v. Amoco Oil Co.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Sanders v. Amoco Oil Co.

320 S.E.2d 334, 283 S.C. 195, 1984 S.C. App. LEXIS 561

CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina

DecidedSeptember 17, 1984

Docket0275

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 320 S.E.2d 334 (Sanders v. Amoco Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sanders v. Amoco Oil Co., 320 S.E.2d 334, 283 S.C. 195, 1984 S.C. App. LEXIS 561 (S.C. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Appellant, Robbie W. Sanders, brought this action in her home County of Allendale for personal injuries she sustained in a vehicle collision that occurred in Jasper County. The respondents served notice of motion for change of venue. Their motion was predicated on the grounds that they were not residents of Allendale County, and that the convenience of the witnesses and the ends of justice would best be serve by changing venue to Jasper County. The trial judge changed venue based on the grounds that the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice mandated the change.

This case is controlled by the holdings in Godley v. Uniroyal, Inc., 278 S. C. 571, 300 S. E. (2d) 78 (1983) and Lewis v. Atkinson Implement Co., Inc., 280 S. C. 87, 311 S. E. (2d) 80 (S. C. App. 1983). Accordingly the trial court’s order is interlocutory and not immediately appealable. This appeal is therefore dismissed without prejudice.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Appellant, Robbie W. Sanders, brought this action in her home County of Allendale for personal injuries she sustained in a vehicle collision that occurred in Jasper County. The respondents served notice of motion for change of venue. Their motion was predicated on the grounds that they were not residents of Allendale County, and that the convenience of the witnesses and the ends of justice would best be serve by changing venue to Jasper County. The trial judge changed venue based on the grounds that the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice mandated the change.

This case is controlled by the holdings in Godley v. Uniroyal, Inc., 278 S. C. 571, 300 S. E. (2d) 78 (1983) and Lewis v. Atkinson Implement Co., Inc., 280 S. C. 87, 311 S. E. (2d) 80 (S. C. App. 1983). Accordingly the trial court’s order is interlocutory and not immediately appealable. This appeal is therefore dismissed without prejudice.

Dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

320 S.E.2d 334, 283 S.C. 195, 1984 S.C. App. LEXIS 561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanders-v-amoco-oil-co-scctapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack