Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Sanderbeck v. Medina Cty.

Sanderbeck v. Medina Cty.

939 N.E.2d 1266, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1502
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 19, 2011
Docket2010-1654
StatusPublished

This text of 939 N.E.2d 1266 (Sanderbeck v. Medina Cty.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sanderbeck v. Medina Cty., 939 N.E.2d 1266, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1502 (Ohio 2011).

Opinion

Medina App. No. 09CA0051-M, 2010-Ohio-3659. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II. Pfeifer, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., dissent.

[1503]*1503Discretionary cross-appeal not accepted.

O’Connor, C.J., and McGee Brown, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
939 N.E.2d 1266, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanderbeck-v-medina-cty-ohio-2011.