Sanderbeck v. Medina Cty.

939 N.E.2d 1266, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1502

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 19, 2011·No. 2010-1654·Published

Opinion

Medina App. No. 09CA0051-M, 2010-Ohio-3659. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II. Pfeifer, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., dissent.

[1503] Discretionary cross-appeal not accepted.

O’Connor, C.J., and McGee Brown, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sanderbeck v. Medina Cty., 939 N.E.2d 1266, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1502 (Ohio 2011).

Pincite

939 N.E.2d 1266 (Sanderbeck v. Medina Cty.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.