Sandcroft's License
This text of 31 A. 948 (Sandcroft's License) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is conceded that appellant’s application for a retail liquor license was heard, considered and refused by the court for the reason “ that there is no necessity for the house to be licensed.” The fact of the refusal and the reason therefor, above quoted, are both recited in the assignment of error.
In the absence of anything on the record to justify us in so doing, we have no right to assume that the court acted arbitrarily, or that the reason assigned for its action in refusing appellant a license had no existence in fact.
Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
31 A. 948, 168 Pa. 45, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 754, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sandcrofts-license-pa-1895.