Sandbloom, Stephen Jay

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 10, 2014
DocketWR-79,922-02
StatusPublished

This text of Sandbloom, Stephen Jay (Sandbloom, Stephen Jay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sandbloom, Stephen Jay, (Tex. 2014).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-79,922-02

EX PARTE STEPHEN JAY SANDBLOOM, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 10-DCR-053774A-HC2 IN THE 400th DISTRICT COURT FROM FORT BEND COUNTY

Per curiam.

ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of the offense of

aggravated robbery and sentenced to imprisonment for 40 years.

Applicant contends, inter alia, that his plea of guilty was involuntary, that he received

ineffective assistance of counsel and that the plea agreement was breached in this case. In response

to Applicant’s allegations, the State requests, in pertinent part:

To enable trial counsel to provide a full and complete response to Applicant’s allegations, the State requests the Court to order trial counsel, Ira Perz, to provide a responsive affidavit addressing Applicant’s allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel and an involuntary plea. Counsel may then include in his affidavit the confidential information that informed his trial strategy and decisions and any confidential information that might aid the Court in resolving the issue of whether Applicant’s plea was involuntary.

In addition, the habeas record includes a signed order designating issues (ODI). The ODI

designates the following issues for resolution:

– Whether Applicant’s plea of guilty was involuntary? – Whether the plea agreement was breached? – Whether Applicant was provided the effective assistance of counsel?

Given the aforementioned facts, we find the habeas record has been forwarded to this Court

prematurely. We remand this application to the 400th District Court of Fort Bend County to allow

the trial judge to complete an evidentiary investigation and enter findings of fact and conclusions of

law.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall

be obtained from this Court.

Filed: December 10, 2014 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Sandbloom, Stephen Jay, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sandbloom-stephen-jay-texcrimapp-2014.