Sandak v. White

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sandak v. White

283 A.D. 734, 128 N.Y.S.2d 574, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5099

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 8, 1954

StatusPublished

This text of 283 A.D. 734 (Sandak v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sandak v. White, 283 A.D. 734, 128 N.Y.S.2d 574, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5099 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by the father of the injured infant plaintiff involved in Sandak v. Tuxedo Union School Dist. No. 3 {ante, p. 732), decided herewith, to recover for medical expenses and loss of his daughter’s services from the teachers, the latter moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground of insufficiency in that it fails to allege that a notice of claim was served on respondents in compliance with subdivision 2 of section 3813 of the Education Law. The motion was granted. Order dismissing complaint, and the judgment entered thereon, unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ. [204 Mise. 178.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by the father of the injured infant plaintiff involved in Sandak v. Tuxedo Union School Dist. No. 3 {ante, p. 732), decided herewith, to recover for medical expenses and loss of his daughter’s services from the teachers, the latter moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground of insufficiency in that it fails to allege that a notice of claim was served on respondents in compliance with subdivision 2 of section 3813 of the Education Law. The motion was granted. Order dismissing complaint, and the judgment entered thereon, unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ. [204 Mise. 178.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 A.D. 734, 128 N.Y.S.2d 574, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5099, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sandak-v-white-nyappdiv-1954.