Sand Dollar Investments, Inc. v. Anja, Inc.

492 So. 2d 1, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1180, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7904
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 21, 1986·No. No. 85-648·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

On the main appeal, we reverse and remand with direction to calculate a reasonable attorney’s fee in accordance with the guidelines set out in Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1985). The mortgage required appellants to pay a reasonable fee. There being no percentage recited in the instrument, section 687.06, Florida Statutes (1985) does not apply.1 See Sepler v. Emanuel, 388 So.2d 28 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Dean v. Coyne, 455 So.2d 576 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).

We affirm the cross appeal.

GLICKSTEIN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur. LETTS, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sand Dollar Investments, Inc. v. Anja, Inc., 492 So. 2d 1, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1180, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7904 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

492 So. 2d 1 (Sand Dollar Investments, Inc. v. Anja, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sepler v. Emanuel
388 So. 2d 28 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Dean v. Coyne
455 So. 2d 576 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Rowe
472 So. 2d 1145 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)