Sancho v. Whitney

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Sancho v. Whitney

1931 OK 202, 5 P.2d 758, 148 Okla. 259, 1931 Okla. LEXIS 872

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 28, 1931

Docket19933

StatusPublished

This text of 1931 OK 202 (Sancho v. Whitney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sancho v. Whitney, 1931 OK 202, 5 P.2d 758, 148 Okla. 259, 1931 Okla. LEXIS 872 (Okla. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

RILEY,, J.

Substantially the same facts are pleaded in this case as in En-le-te-ke et al. v. W. A. Beasley et al., No. 19939, this day decided, 148 Okla. 255, 298 Pac. 611, except that the mother of the original al-lottee is still living. She claims an interest in the allotted lands of the allottee. From all the allegations of the petition it may be fairly inferred that she has conveyed whatever interest she.inherited as mother of the deceased allottee. This being true, she thereby conveyed the entire fee and there was nothing for her to inherit from the brother of the deceased allottee.

It follows from what we have held in the En-le-te-ke Case that the judgment in this case should be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

LESTER. C. J., and HEFNER, CULU-SON, SWINDALL, ANDREWS, McNEILL, and KORNEGAY, JJ., concur. CLARK, V. C. J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RILEY,, J.

Substantially the same facts are pleaded in this case as in En-le-te-ke et al. v. W. A. Beasley et al., No. 19939, this day decided, 148 Okla. 255, 298 Pac. 611, except that the mother of the original al-lottee is still living. She claims an interest in the allotted lands of the allottee. From all the allegations of the petition it may be fairly inferred that she has conveyed whatever interest she.inherited as mother of the deceased allottee. This being true, she thereby conveyed the entire fee and there was nothing for her to inherit from the brother of the deceased allottee.

It follows from what we have held in the En-le-te-ke Case that the judgment in this case should be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

LESTER. C. J., and HEFNER, CULU-SON, SWINDALL, ANDREWS, McNEILL, and KORNEGAY, JJ., concur. CLARK, V. C. J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1931 OK 202, 5 P.2d 758, 148 Okla. 259, 1931 Okla. LEXIS 872, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sancho-v-whitney-okla-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack