Sanchez v. Taveraz

129 A.D.3d 506, 11 N.Y.S.3d 141
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 11, 2015
Docket15405
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 129 A.D.3d 506 (Sanchez v. Taveraz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sanchez v. Taveraz, 129 A.D.3d 506, 11 N.Y.S.3d 141 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mary Ann Brigantti-Hughes, J.), entered on or about May 23, 2014, which denied plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs failed to establish entitlement to judgment as a matter of law in this action where plaintiffs, passengers in a vehicle owned by defendant Roque Taveraz and operated by defendant Kathiana Taveraz, were injured when the vehicle in which they were riding was involved in an accident with a vehicle driven by defendant Domingo Perez and owned by defendant Liberato Food. Plaintiffs failed to show that any of the defendants’ negligence was a proximate cause of the accident (see Coleman v Maclas, 61 AD3d 569 [1st Dept 2009]). The police report upon which plaintiffs relied was uncertified (see Raposo v Robinson, 106 AD3d 593 [1st Dept 2013]), and plaintiffs’ affidavits lack any details as to how the accident occurred (compare Delgado v Martinez Family Auto, 113 AD3d 426 [1st Dept 2014] [the plaintiff submitted an affidavit in which she stated that the driver of the vehicle in which she was riding apologized for driving at an excessive rate of speed, which constituted a party admission and established a violation of the Vehicle and Traffic Law]). To the extent the motion court found plaintiffs’ possible failure to wear a seatbelt would be a defense to liability, such was error (id. at 428) because that would go to the issue of comparative negligence.

Concur— Tom, J.P., Renwick, Andrias, Manzanet-Daniels and Kapnick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Progressive Advanced Insurance v. McAdam
139 A.D.3d 691 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
129 A.D.3d 506, 11 N.Y.S.3d 141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanchez-v-taveraz-nyappdiv-2015.