Sanchez v. Taveraz

129 A.D.3d 506, 11 N.Y.S.3d 141
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 11, 2015·No. 15405·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mary Ann Brigantti-Hughes, J.), entered on or about May 23, 2014, which denied plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs failed to establish entitlement to judgment as a matter of law in this action where plaintiffs, passengers in a vehicle owned by defendant Roque Taveraz and operated by defendant Kathiana Taveraz, were injured when the vehicle in which they were riding was involved in an accident with a vehicle driven by defendant Domingo Perez and owned by defendant Liberato Food. Plaintiffs failed to show that any of the defendants’ negligence was a proximate cause of the accident (see Coleman v Maclas, 61 AD3d 569 [1st Dept 2009]). The police report upon which plaintiffs relied was uncertified (see Raposo v Robinson, 106 AD3d 593 [1st Dept 2013]), and plaintiffs’ affidavits lack any details as to how the accident occurred (compare Delgado v Martinez Family Auto, 113 AD3d 426 [1st Dept 2014] [the plaintiff submitted an affidavit in which she stated that the driver of the vehicle in which she was riding apologized for driving at an excessive rate of speed, which constituted a party admission and established a violation of the Vehicle and Traffic Law]). To the extent the motion court found plaintiffs’ possible failure to wear a seatbelt would be a defense to liability, such was error (id. at 428) because that would go to the issue of comparative negligence.

Concur— Tom, J.P., Renwick, Andrias, Manzanet-Daniels and Kapnick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sanchez v. Taveraz, 129 A.D.3d 506, 11 N.Y.S.3d 141 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

129 A.D.3d 506 (Sanchez v. Taveraz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Progressive Advanced Insurance v. McAdam
139 A.D.3d 691 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)