Sanchez v. Shark

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sanchez v. Shark

96 A.D.2d 1022, 466 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19676

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 29, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 96 A.D.2d 1022 (Sanchez v. Shark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sanchez v. Shark, 96 A.D.2d 1022, 466 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19676 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alfred J. Callahan, J.), entered on June 29,1982, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent of reversing the judgment in favor of plaintiff Gloria B. Sanchez and a new trial ordered on the issue of damages awarded to said plaintiff, with $75 costs and disbursements of this appeal to abide the event, and said judgment is otherwise affirmed, unless defendant, within 20 days after service upon her of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to increase the award to said plaintiff to $10,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If the defendant so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended and increased, is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Concur ■—■ Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Carro, Milonas and Alexander, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alfred J. Callahan, J.), entered on June 29,1982, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent of reversing the judgment in favor of plaintiff Gloria B. Sanchez and a new trial ordered on the issue of damages awarded to said plaintiff, with $75 costs and disbursements of this appeal to abide the event, and said judgment is otherwise affirmed, unless defendant, within 20 days after service upon her of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to increase the award to said plaintiff to $10,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If the defendant so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended and increased, is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Concur ■—■ Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Carro, Milonas and Alexander, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 A.D.2d 1022, 466 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanchez-v-shark-nyappdiv-1983.