Sanchez v. Sanchez

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sanchez v. Sanchez

958 So. 2d 1054, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 9143, 2007 WL 1687278

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 13, 2007

DocketNo. 1D07-1622

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 958 So. 2d 1054 (Sanchez v. Sanchez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sanchez v. Sanchez, 958 So. 2d 1054, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 9143, 2007 WL 1687278 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

WOLF, J.

Appellant raises two points on appeal. We find one has merit. The trial court’s order fails to address the statutory factors set out in section 61.13001(7), Florida Statutes (2006). We also are unable to ascertain from the record why the trial court allowed the father to relocate with the minor children. We, therefore, reverse that portion of the order allowing the relocation. On remand, the trial court should expeditiously consider and address the statutory factors to determine whether relocation should be permitted. If the trial court feels more evidence is necessary, it may take further testimony as to this issue.

BROWNING, C.J., and THOMAS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WOLF, J.

Appellant raises two points on appeal. We find one has merit. The trial court’s order fails to address the statutory factors set out in section 61.13001(7), Florida Statutes (2006). We also are unable to ascertain from the record why the trial court allowed the father to relocate with the minor children. We, therefore, reverse that portion of the order allowing the relocation. On remand, the trial court should expeditiously consider and address the statutory factors to determine whether relocation should be permitted. If the trial court feels more evidence is necessary, it may take further testimony as to this issue.

BROWNING, C.J., and THOMAS, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

958 So. 2d 1054, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 9143, 2007 WL 1687278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanchez-v-sanchez-fladistctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack