Sanchez v. Rigney

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 kee 4 JASMINE PAUL SANCHEZ, Case No. 3:22-CV-00109-ART-CLB 5 Plaintiff, ORDER TO FILE OPPOSITION TO 6 y MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

7 CHET RIGNEY, 8 Defendant. 9 10 On July 5, 2023, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 23.) 11 | Plaintiff was given notice of the motion pursuant to the requirements of Klingele v. Ejikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988), and Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 13 | 1998) (ECF No. 28). To date, Plaintiff has failed to file an opposition. 14 The Court will sua sponte grant Plaintiff one extension of time to August 30, 2023, 15 | to file an opposition to the motion for summary judgment. No further extensions of time 16 | shall be granted. If Plaintiff fails to file an opposition, the motion will be submitted to the 17 | court for decision. 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19| DATED: July 31, 2023. . 20 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28