Sanchez v. Newman

11 P. 645, 70 Cal. 210, 1886 Cal. LEXIS 765
California Supreme Court·Decided July 26, 1886·No. No. 11321·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Thornton, J.

This is an appeal from an order in a proceeding for contempt against one B. Newman. By the order referred to, the proceeding against Newman was dismissed for want of jurisdiction. In Tyler v. Connolly, 65 Cal. 28, it was held that there is no appeal from a judgment in a case of contempt. We find nothing in this case which takes it out of the rule laid down in the case cited. For the reasons given in Tyler v. Connolly, we are of opinion that there can be no appeal -here. The appeal must therefore be dismissed, and it is so ordered.

Sharpstein, J., and McKee, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sanchez v. Newman, 11 P. 645, 70 Cal. 210, 1886 Cal. LEXIS 765 (Cal. 1886).

11 P. 645 (Sanchez v. Newman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Butler v. Butler
255 Cal. App. 2d 132 (California Court of Appeal, 1967)
Devine v. Devine
213 Cal. App. 2d 549 (California Court of Appeal, 1963)
In re the Estate of Wittmeier
50 P. 393 (California Supreme Court, 1897)
Natoma Water & Min. Co. v. Hancock
36 P. 100 (California Supreme Court, 1894)
In re Vance
26 P. 101 (California Supreme Court, 1891)