Sanchez v. New York State Liquor Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sanchez v. New York State Liquor Authority

60 A.D.2d 544, 400 N.Y.S.2d 62, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14462

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 60 A.D.2d 544 (Sanchez v. New York State Liquor Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sanchez v. New York State Liquor Authority, 60 A.D.2d 544, 400 N.Y.S.2d 62, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14462 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered June 17, 1977, annulling the determination of the State Liquor Authority dated October 12, 1976, and directing respondent State Liquor Authority to issue to petitioner a retail liquor store license for the premises 726 Courtlandt Avenue, Bronx, New York, is reversed, on the law, vacated and the determination of the State Liquor Authority is reinstated and the petition is dismissed, without costs and without disbursements. On this record, we are unable to say that the refusal of the license by the State Liquor Authority was arbitrary and capricious and without rational basis. Concur—Lupiano, Birns and Silverman, JJ.; Kupferman, J. P., dissents and would affirm on the opinion of Cotton, J., at Special Term.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered June 17, 1977, annulling the determination of the State Liquor Authority dated October 12, 1976, and directing respondent State Liquor Authority to issue to petitioner a retail liquor store license for the premises 726 Courtlandt Avenue, Bronx, New York, is reversed, on the law, vacated and the determination of the State Liquor Authority is reinstated and the petition is dismissed, without costs and without disbursements. On this record, we are unable to say that the refusal of the license by the State Liquor Authority was arbitrary and capricious and without rational basis. Concur—Lupiano, Birns and Silverman, JJ.; Kupferman, J. P., dissents and would affirm on the opinion of Cotton, J., at Special Term.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 A.D.2d 544, 400 N.Y.S.2d 62, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanchez-v-new-york-state-liquor-authority-nyappdiv-1977.