Sanchez v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sanchez v. New York City Transit Authority

2017 NY Slip Op 4899, 151 A.D.3d 564, 54 N.Y.S.3d 280

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 2017

Docket4039 304528/11

StatusPublished

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 4899 (Sanchez v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sanchez v. New York City Transit Authority, 2017 NY Slip Op 4899, 151 A.D.3d 564, 54 N.Y.S.3d 280 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mary Ann Brigantti, J.), entered May 4, 2016, which granted defendant’s motion to set aside the jury’s verdict as against the weight of the evidence and direct that a new trial be held on the issue of liability, unanimously reversed, on the facts, without costs, and the motion denied.

In this action for personal injuries, plaintiff alleges that he fell while descending a covered and unlit exterior subway staircase owned by defendant. The jury found that defendant was negligent in its maintenance of the lighting on the staircase, that defendant’s negligence was a substantial factor in causing plaintiff’s injuries, and that plaintiff was not negligent.

The trial court erred in setting aside as against the weight of the evidence the jury’s finding that plaintiff was not negligent (see Jones v New York-Presbyterian Hosp., 150 AD3d 412 [1st Dept 2017]; Soler v Jersey Boring & Drilling Co., Inc., 143 AD3d 421 [1st Dept 2016]; see also CPLR 4404 [a]). Although plaintiff conceded that he descended an unlighted staircase, the jury could reasonably have concluded that his decision to *565 do so was not negligent, as plaintiff testified that he used the same staircase every night while coming home from work, and had in fact done so without incident on previous evenings when the lights were inoperative.

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Richter, Moskowitz, Gische and Kapnick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mary Ann Brigantti, J.), entered May 4, 2016, which granted defendant’s motion to set aside the jury’s verdict as against the weight of the evidence and direct that a new trial be held on the issue of liability, unanimously reversed, on the facts, without costs, and the motion denied.

In this action for personal injuries, plaintiff alleges that he fell while descending a covered and unlit exterior subway staircase owned by defendant. The jury found that defendant was negligent in its maintenance of the lighting on the staircase, that defendant’s negligence was a substantial factor in causing plaintiff’s injuries, and that plaintiff was not negligent.

The trial court erred in setting aside as against the weight of the evidence the jury’s finding that plaintiff was not negligent (see Jones v New York-Presbyterian Hosp., 150 AD3d 412 [1st Dept 2017]; Soler v Jersey Boring & Drilling Co., Inc., 143 AD3d 421 [1st Dept 2016]; see also CPLR 4404 [a]). Although plaintiff conceded that he descended an unlighted staircase, the jury could reasonably have concluded that his decision to *565 do so was not negligent, as plaintiff testified that he used the same staircase every night while coming home from work, and had in fact done so without incident on previous evenings when the lights were inoperative.

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Richter, Moskowitz, Gische and Kapnick, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2017 NY Slip Op 4899, 151 A.D.3d 564, 54 N.Y.S.3d 280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanchez-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-nyappdiv-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack