Sanchez v. Missouri Div. of Youth Services

Missouri Court of Appeals

Sanchez v. Missouri Div. of Youth Services

672 S.W.2d 164, 1984 Mo. App. LEXIS 3830

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 9, 1984

DocketNo. 47465

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 672 S.W.2d 164 (Sanchez v. Missouri Div. of Youth Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sanchez v. Missouri Div. of Youth Services, 672 S.W.2d 164, 1984 Mo. App. LEXIS 3830 (Mo. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

CRIST, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff, by and through her next friend, brought an action against defendant agency for personal injuries she received while on defendant’s premises. Plaintiff was sixteen months old when a sign fell from defendant’s building and fractured her skull. The trial court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s petition for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. We affirm.

Plaintiff did not, and apparently in good faith could not, allege defendant possessed liability insurance. In order for a public entity to waive sovereign immunity under §§ 537.600 and 537.610, RSMo 1978, it must have purchased liability insurance or be self-insured. Bartley v. Special School District of St. Louis County, 649 S.W.2d 864 (Mo. banc 1983); McConnell v. St. Louis County, 655 S.W.2d 654, 656-57 (Mo.App. banc 1983).

Plaintiff urges expansion of the nebulous governmental/proprietary distinction from its application to municipalities and school districts to other public entities. This contention has been rejected in the McConnell decision, supra. Plaintiff’s right to recover for her injuries is governed by §§ 537.600 and 537.610. Those statutes require the existence of liability insurance for the waiver of sovereign immunity to be effective. Since the present defendant lacks such coverage, it remains immune from plaintiff’s claim for relief. Thus, the trial court properly dismissed plaintiff’s petition.

Judgment affirmed.

PUDLOWSKI and SIMON, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CRIST, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff, by and through her next friend, brought an action against defendant agency for personal injuries she received while on defendant’s premises. Plaintiff was sixteen months old when a sign fell from defendant’s building and fractured her skull. The trial court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s petition for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. We affirm.

Plaintiff did not, and apparently in good faith could not, allege defendant possessed liability insurance. In order for a public entity to waive sovereign immunity under §§ 537.600 and 537.610, RSMo 1978, it must have purchased liability insurance or be self-insured. Bartley v. Special School District of St. Louis County, 649 S.W.2d 864 (Mo. banc 1983); McConnell v. St. Louis County, 655 S.W.2d 654, 656-57 (Mo.App. banc 1983).

Plaintiff urges expansion of the nebulous governmental/proprietary distinction from its application to municipalities and school districts to other public entities. This contention has been rejected in the McConnell decision, supra. Plaintiff’s right to recover for her injuries is governed by §§ 537.600 and 537.610. Those statutes require the existence of liability insurance for the waiver of sovereign immunity to be effective. Since the present defendant lacks such coverage, it remains immune from plaintiff’s claim for relief. Thus, the trial court properly dismissed plaintiff’s petition.

Judgment affirmed.

PUDLOWSKI and SIMON, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

672 S.W.2d 164, 1984 Mo. App. LEXIS 3830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanchez-v-missouri-div-of-youth-services-moctapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack