Sanchez v. Martinez
Opinion
This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer- generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
No. A-1-CA-39689
MICHAEL G. SANCHEZ,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CAMILLE MARTINEZ, ARMANDO MARTINEZ, and LINDSY MARTINEZ,
Defendants-Appellees.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF VALENCIA COUNTY James A. Noel, District Judge
Michael Sanchez Los Lunas, NM
Pro Se Appellant
Grayson Law Office, LLC Brian G. Grayson Albuquerque, NM
for Appellee Camille Martinez
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ATTREP, Judge.
{1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED.
{2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Judge WE CONCUR:
JACQUELINE R. MEDINA, Judge
MEGAN P. DUFFY, Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sanchez v. Martinez (Sanchez v. Martinez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.