Sanchez v. Hialeah Chamber of Commerce

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sanchez v. Hialeah Chamber of Commerce

811 So. 2d 812, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 3553

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 20, 2002

DocketNos. 3D01-1399, 3D01-775

StatusPublished

This text of 811 So. 2d 812 (Sanchez v. Hialeah Chamber of Commerce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sanchez v. Hialeah Chamber of Commerce, 811 So. 2d 812, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 3553 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

SHEVIN, Judge.

We affirm the final summary judgment in defendants’ favor. When viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, Sierra v. Shevin, 767 So.2d 524 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), the facts reveal that defendants had no duty to protect plaintiffs against criminal acts of third parties, see Hinckley v. Palm Beach County Bd. of County Comm’rs, 801 So.2d 193 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Gross v. Family Serv. Agency, Inc., 716 So.2d 337 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), approved sub nom. Nova Southeastern Univ., Inc. v. Gross, 758 So.2d 86 (Fla.2000); Boynton v. Burglass, 590 So.2d 446 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991), and there is no showing that any "special relationship exception applies in this case that would alter this result. Hinckley; Gross; Boynton.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SHEVIN, Judge.

We affirm the final summary judgment in defendants’ favor. When viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, Sierra v. Shevin, 767 So.2d 524 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), the facts reveal that defendants had no duty to protect plaintiffs against criminal acts of third parties, see Hinckley v. Palm Beach County Bd. of County Comm’rs, 801 So.2d 193 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Gross v. Family Serv. Agency, Inc., 716 So.2d 337 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), approved sub nom. Nova Southeastern Univ., Inc. v. Gross, 758 So.2d 86 (Fla.2000); Boynton v. Burglass, 590 So.2d 446 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991), and there is no showing that any "special relationship exception applies in this case that would alter this result. Hinckley; Gross; Boynton.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

811 So. 2d 812, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 3553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanchez-v-hialeah-chamber-of-commerce-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack