Sanchez v. Hawk
This text of 11 F. App'x 4 (Sanchez v. Hawk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
JUDGMENT
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See Fed. R.App. P. 36; D.C.Cir. Rule 36(b). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed June 14, 2000, be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated therein.
The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 F. App'x 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanchez-v-hawk-cadc-2000.