Sanchez v. Georgia Gulf Corp.
This text of 836 So. 2d 9 (Sanchez v. Georgia Gulf Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Danny SANCHEZ
v.
GEORGIA GULF CORPORATION, et al.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Writ granted. This matter is remanded to the court of appeal for briefing, argument and opinion to address the relationship between the drug testing requirements set forth in La. R.S. 49:1001 et seq. and the employment at-will doctrine.
WEIMER, J., concurs with reasons.
WEIMER, J., concurring.
I concur in the writ grant.
In denying the writ, the court of appeal alluded to this court's opinion in Independent Fire Insurance Co. v. Sunbeam Corp., 99-2181 (La.2/29/00), 755 So.2d 226, which dealt with expert affidavits. Apparently, the court felt summary judgment was inappropriate because Georgia Gulf did not present an expert affidavit to counter plaintiff's expert affidavit regarding the accuracy of the drug testing. However, it is clear that there is no factual dispute concerning the validity of the drug testing because Georgia Gulf conceded it did not follow the statutory provisions. Quite simply, Georgia Gulf takes the position that even if the test was inaccurate, it had the power to terminate plaintiff at will. Thus, the question of whether the test was accurate or not is not an issue of fact that would preclude the consideration of a motion for summary judgement.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
836 So. 2d 9, 2002 La. LEXIS 3358, 2002 WL 31664526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanchez-v-georgia-gulf-corp-la-2002.