Sanchez v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.

842 So. 2d 283, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 5427, 2003 WL 1877415
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 16, 2003·No. No. 3D01-3054·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Montero v. Compugraphic Corp., 531 So.2d 1034, 1036 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) (stating that: “A litigant cannot, in the course of litigation, occupy inconsistent and contradictory positions. Rigg v. Vernell, 428 So.2d 668 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Federated Mut. Implement & Hardware Ins. Co. v. Griffin, 237 So.2d 38 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970), cert. denied, 240 So.2d 641 (Fla.1970).”). See also McCurdy v. J.C. Collis, 508 So.2d 380, 384 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) (doctrine of estoppel against inconsistent positions provides that party who assumed certain position in legal proceeding may not thereafter assume contrary position).

GODERICH and GREEN, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sanchez v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 842 So. 2d 283, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 5427, 2003 WL 1877415 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

842 So. 2d 283 (Sanchez v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Montero v. Compugraphic Corp.
531 So. 2d 1034 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
McCurdy v. Collis
508 So. 2d 380 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
State Farm Auto. Ins. v. Smalley Transp.
696 So. 2d 522 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Rigg v. Vernell
428 So. 2d 668 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
FEDERATED MUT. IMPLEMENT & HDWE. INS. CO. v. Griffin
237 So. 2d 38 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)