Sanchez v. Gasser

255 So. 3d 484
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 20, 2018
DocketNos. 3D17-1796; 3D17-1798 & 3D17-1857
StatusPublished

This text of 255 So. 3d 484 (Sanchez v. Gasser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sanchez v. Gasser, 255 So. 3d 484 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Cardona v. Casas, 225 So.3d 384, 384 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) ("[W]e *485cannot review whether the trial court abused its discretion or committed harmful error without a transcript or reconstructed record of the multi-day dissolution and attorney's fees hearings."); Duke v. Duke, 211 So.3d 1078, 1080 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) ("Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court cannot properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence. Thus, for an appellate court to review the sufficiency of evidence at trial, the appellant must either include in the record a trial transcript or a proper substitute, such as a stipulated statement of facts." (citations omitted) ).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Duke v. Duke
211 So. 3d 1078 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Cardona v. Paulhiac Casas
225 So. 3d 384 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
255 So. 3d 484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanchez-v-gasser-fladistctapp-2018.