Sanchez v. Delta Airlines, Inc.

2020 NY Slip Op 06970, 188 A.D.3d 616, 132 N.Y.S.3d 744
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 24, 2020
DocketIndex No. 27247/18E Appeal No. 12468 Case No. 2019-5782
StatusPublished

This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 06970 (Sanchez v. Delta Airlines, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sanchez v. Delta Airlines, Inc., 2020 NY Slip Op 06970, 188 A.D.3d 616, 132 N.Y.S.3d 744 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

Sanchez v Delta Airlines, Inc. (2020 NY Slip Op 06970)
Sanchez v Delta Airlines, Inc.
2020 NY Slip Op 06970
Decided on November 24, 2020
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: November 24, 2020
Before: Friedman, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Oing, Kennedy, JJ.

Index No. 27247/18E Appeal No. 12468 Case No. 2019-5782

[*1]Jose Junco Sanchez Also Known as Jose Junco, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

Delta Airlines, Inc., et al., Defendants-Respondents.


Gabriel Fischbarg, New York, for appellant.

Shearer PC, Locust Valley (Mark G. Vaughan of counsel), for respondents.



Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ruben Franco, J.), entered July 2, 2019, which granted the motion of defendant Delta Airlines, Inc. (Delta) to dismiss the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly granted Delta's motion to dismiss the complaint as against it wherein plaintiff alleged that he sustained injuries while at work. Plaintiff's claims against Delta, his employer, are barred by the exclusive remedy of the Workers' Compensation Law (see Workers' Compensation Law§ §11, 29[6]; Jean-Louis v Hilton Hotels Corp., 68 AD3d 406 [1st Dept 2009]). Furthermore, plaintiff's argument that the intentional tort exception to the Workers' [*2]Compensation Law applies is unpreserved

(see Davila v City of New York, 95 AD3d 560, 561 [1st Dept 2012]), and in any event, is unavailing. THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: November 24, 2020



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davila v. City of New York
95 A.D.3d 560 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 NY Slip Op 06970, 188 A.D.3d 616, 132 N.Y.S.3d 744, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanchez-v-delta-airlines-inc-nyappdiv-2020.