Sanchez v. Dade County School Bd.

784 So. 2d 1172, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4015, 2001 WL 293692
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 28, 2001
Docket3D00-1718
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 784 So. 2d 1172 (Sanchez v. Dade County School Bd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sanchez v. Dade County School Bd., 784 So. 2d 1172, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4015, 2001 WL 293692 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

784 So.2d 1172 (2001)

Caridad SANCHEZ, et al., Appellants,
v.
DADE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, etc., Appellee.

No. 3D00-1718.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 28, 2001.
Rehearing Denied May 30, 2001.

Jack L. Herskowitz, and Jon Herskowitz, Miami; and Dorothy F. Easley, Coral Gables, for appellants.

Pyszka, Blackmon, Levy & Mowers, Miami Lakes, and Cindy J. Mishcon, for appellee.

Before LEVY, GREEN, and RAMIREZ, JJ.

Rehearing En Banc Denied May 30, 2001.

PER CURIAM.

Caridad Sanchez, a middle school teacher, sued the Dade County School Board for negligence after she was sexually assaulted and beaten during her lunch period by a trespasser in the teachers' parking lot. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the School Board based on its workers' compensation *1173 immunity. We agree that by accepting workers' compensation benefits, Sanchez was precluded from asserting a tort claim against her employer. See § 440.11, Fla. Stat. (1999). We recently held in Dade County Sch. Bd. v. Laing, 731 So.2d 19 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) that the "unrelated works" exception to workers' compensation immunity did not apply between a teacher and a custodian. "The fact that employees have different duties does not necessarily mean they are involved in `unrelated works.'... Because both were engaged in activities primarily related to the provision of education related services, the `unrelated works' exception to the School Board's immunity under Section 440.11(1) does not apply." Id. at 20. We see no distinction between the teacher-custodian relationship in Laing and the teacher-security personnel relationship in this case.

We therefore affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Aravena v. Miami-Dade County
928 So. 2d 1163 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2006)
Lluch v. American Airlines, Inc.
899 So. 2d 1146 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Sanchez v. Dade County School Board
889 So. 2d 778 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)
Miami-Dade County v. Aravena
886 So. 2d 303 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Taylor v. School Bd. of Brevard County
888 So. 2d 1 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)
Florida Dept. of Transp. v. Juliano
864 So. 2d 11 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Fitzgerald v. South Broward Hosp. Dist.
840 So. 2d 460 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
784 So. 2d 1172, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4015, 2001 WL 293692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanchez-v-dade-county-school-bd-fladistctapp-2001.