Sanchez v. Crandon Wholesale Drug Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sanchez v. Crandon Wholesale Drug Co.

174 So. 2d 780, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4136

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 10, 1965

DocketNo. 64-85

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 174 So. 2d 780 (Sanchez v. Crandon Wholesale Drug Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sanchez v. Crandon Wholesale Drug Co., 174 So. 2d 780, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4136 (Fla. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on September 29, 1964 (167 So.2d 640) affirming the order of the Civil Court of Record in and for Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and

Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion and judgment filed April 17, 1965 and mandate dated April 28, 1965, now lodged in this court, 173 So.2d 687, quashed this court’s judgment of affirmance with instructions that the cause be returned to the trial court with directions to reinstate the complaint and proceed further in a manner not inconsistent with the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida;

Therefore, it is ordered that the mandate of this court issued in this cause on October 14, 1964 is withdrawn, the judgment of this court filed September 29, 1964 is vacated, the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court, and the order of the Civil Court of Record appealed from in this cause is reversed with directions to reinstate the complaint and to proceed further in a manner not inconsistent with the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the trial court (Rule 3.16, subd. b, Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.SA.).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on September 29, 1964 (167 So.2d 640) affirming the order of the Civil Court of Record in and for Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and

Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion and judgment filed April 17, 1965 and mandate dated April 28, 1965, now lodged in this court, 173 So.2d 687, quashed this court’s judgment of affirmance with instructions that the cause be returned to the trial court with directions to reinstate the complaint and proceed further in a manner not inconsistent with the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida;

Therefore, it is ordered that the mandate of this court issued in this cause on October 14, 1964 is withdrawn, the judgment of this court filed September 29, 1964 is vacated, the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court, and the order of the Civil Court of Record appealed from in this cause is reversed with directions to reinstate the complaint and to proceed further in a manner not inconsistent with the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the trial court (Rule 3.16, subd. b, Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.SA.).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

174 So. 2d 780, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanchez-v-crandon-wholesale-drug-co-fladistctapp-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack