Sanchez v. Borras

Supreme Court

Sanchez v. Borras

283 U.S. 798, 51 S. Ct. 490, 75 L. Ed. 1421, 1931 U.S. LEXIS 207

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 27, 1931·No. No. 423·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

As it does not appear, upon an examination of the record, that the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals, upon the [799] facts disclosed, is in conflict with the decisions of the Supreme Court of Porto Rico, the writ of certiorari granted herein is dismissed.

Mr. Nelson Gammans for petitioner. Mr. Henry G. Molina, with whom Messrs. Sidney P. Simpson and Archie 0. Dawson were on the brief, for respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

As it does not appear, upon an examination of the record, that the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals, upon the [799] facts disclosed, is in conflict with the decisions of the Supreme Court of Porto Rico, the writ of certiorari granted herein is dismissed.

Mr. Nelson Gammans for petitioner. Mr. Henry G. Molina, with whom Messrs. Sidney P. Simpson and Archie 0. Dawson were on the brief, for respondent.

Sanchez v. Borras, 283 U.S. 798, 51 S. Ct. 490, 75 L. Ed. 1421, 1931 U.S. LEXIS 207 (1931).

Pincite

283 U.S. 798 (Sanchez v. Borras) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related