Sanchez v. Bet Eli Co. Del. LLC
This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 8275 (Sanchez v. Bet Eli Co. Del. LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| Sanchez v Bet Eli Co. Del. LLC |
| 2019 NY Slip Op 08275 |
| Decided on November 14, 2019 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on November 14, 2019
Gische, J.P., Webber, Kern, Moulton, JJ.
10343 155420/14
v
The Bet Eli Company Delaware LLC, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Vigorito, Barker, Patterson, Nichols & Porter, LLP, Garden City (Adonaid C. Medina of counsel), for The Bet Eli Company Delaware LLC and Newmark & Company Real Estate, Inc., appellants.
Milber Makris Plousadis & Seiden, LLP, Woodbury (Lorin A. Donnelly of counsel), for Artisan Construction Partners LLC, appellant.
William Schwitzer & Associates, P.C., New York (D. Allen Zachary of counsel), for respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert David Kalish, J.), entered on or about January 18, 2019, which granted plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability on his Labor Law § 240(1) cause of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Partial summary judgment was properly granted in this action where plaintiff was injured when he fell from a scaffold. There is no dispute that the scaffold plaintiff was supplied with and directed to use lacked railings, and that he was not provided with any other safety devices (see Celaj v Cornell, 144 AD3d 590 [1st Dept 2016]; Vergara v SS 133 W. 21, LLC, 21 AD3d 279 [1st Dept 2005]). Plaintiff was not required to show that the scaffold was defective (see Ross v 1510 Assoc. LLC, 106 AD3d 471 [1st Dept 2013]; see also Kash v McCann Real Equities Devs., 279 AD2d 432 [1st Dept 2001]). In opposition, defendants failed to raise a triable issue of fact.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: NOVEMBER 14, 2019
CLERK
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2019 NY Slip Op 8275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanchez-v-bet-eli-co-del-llc-nyappdiv-2019.