Sanchez-Rivera v. United States

District Court, S.D. California·Decided October 19, 2023·No. 3:22-cv-01254·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JUAN SANCHEZ-RIVERA, Case No. 22-cv-1254-BAS-BGS

12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING JOINT 13 v. MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF No. 44)

14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.

15 Defendants. 16 17 Before this Court is the parties’ request to dismiss this action with prejudice pursuant 18 to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 41. (Mot., ECF No. 44.) Under Rule 19 41(a)(1)(A), a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss its action by (1) filing a 20 notice of voluntary dismissal before a defendant has filed an answer or moved for summary 21 judgment, see Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), or (2) filing a stipulation of dismissal signed by all 22 parties who have appeared, see Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). See also Wilson v. City of San Jose, 23 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) is effective 24 upon the filing of a compliant notice or stipulation. No court order is required. See Stone 25 v. Woodford, CIV-F-05-845 AWI-DLB, 2007 WL 527766 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2007). 26 Nonetheless, the local civil rules of this district require that where, as here, litigants seek 27 28 1 || voluntary dismissal by filing a signed stipulation pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i1), such a 2 ||stipulation must be filed as a joint motion.! 3 A dismissal is without prejudice unless the parties stipulate otherwise. See Fed. R. 4 ||Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(B). Here, the parties have stipulated otherwise. (See Mot., ECF No. 44 5 (stipulating to dismissal with prejudice).) 6 Having considered the parties’ request, the Court GRANTS the Joint Motion. (ECF 7 || No. 44.) Thus, the Court DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE the instant action. The Clerk 8 || of Court is directed to close the case. 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. / , 10 || DATED: October 19, 2023 Lin 4 (aphaark 11 United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 || ——_—— 28 See Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual, United States District Court for the Southern District of California.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sanchez-Rivera v. United States, (S.D. Cal. 2023).

Sanchez-Rivera v. United States (Sanchez-Rivera v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)