Sanchez-Basulto v. State
610 So. 2d 564, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12698, 1992 WL 360841
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 8, 1992·No. No. 91-642·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Affirmed. See State v. McCall, 524 So.2d 663 (Fla.1988). Cf. Cleveland v. State, 587 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1991) (“[W]hen a robbery conviction is enhanced because of the use of a firearm in committing the robbery, the single act involving the use of the same firearm in the commission of the same robbery cannot form the basis of a separate conviction and sentence for use of a firearm while committing a felony_”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sanchez-Basulto v. State, 610 So. 2d 564, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12698, 1992 WL 360841 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
610 So. 2d 564 (Sanchez-Basulto v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Abreu v. State
610 So. 2d 564 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)