Sanches v. Mukasey
This text of 309 F. App'x 199 (Sanches v. Mukasey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Felix Enrrique Palacios Sanches and Maria De Lourdes Palacios, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denial of their motion to reopen, challenging the underlying denial of their application for cancellation of removal due to petitioners’ failure to establish the requisite hardship to their qualifying relatives.
The evidence that petitioners presented with their motion to reopen concerned the same basic hardship grounds as their application for cancellation of removal. We therefore lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary determination that the evidence was insufficient to establish a prima facie case of hardship. See Fernandez v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 592, 601-03 (9th Cir.2006).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
309 F. App'x 199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanches-v-mukasey-ca9-2009.