Sanborn v. State

91 So. 3d 258, 2012 WL 2466576, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 10575
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 29, 2012·No. Nos. 5D11-3881, 5B11-4054, 5D11-4207, 5D11-4208, 5D11-4209, 5D11-4210, 5D11-4211, 5D11-4294, 5D11-4295, 5D11-4296, 5D11-4413, 5D11-4416·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Flagg v. State, 74 So.3d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). We certify that the same issue reviewed in each of these consolidated cases is currently pending before the Florida Supreme Court in State v. Adkins, 71 So.3d 117 (Fla.2011). The mandates will be withheld pending final disposition of Adkins.

MONACO, TORPY, and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sanborn v. State, 91 So. 3d 258, 2012 WL 2466576, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 10575 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

91 So. 3d 258 (Sanborn v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Flagg v. State
74 So. 3d 138 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
State v. Adkins
71 So. 3d 117 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2011)