Sanborn v. State

557 So. 2d 132, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 804, 1990 WL 11806
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sanborn v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2475
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 13, 1990·No. No. 89-1394·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Agreeing with the trial court’s pronouncements that clear and convincing reasons support departure from the sentencing guidelines, State v. Mischler, 488 So.2d 523 (Fla.1986); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11), we affirm appellant’s sentence.

Affirmed.

BASKIN and GERSTEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sanborn v. State, 557 So. 2d 132, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 804, 1990 WL 11806 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

557 So. 2d 132 (Sanborn v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure Re: Sentencing Guidelines
522 So. 2d 374 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
State v. Mischler
488 So. 2d 523 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)