Sanborn v. Sanborn

1 Ohio Law. Abs. 134
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sanborn v. Sanborn. Read the opinion of the Court — 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 880
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1922·No. No. 17387·Published

Opinion

MARSHALL, C. J.:

Where a court of competent jurisdiction, having all parties before it, and having jurisdiction of the subject-matter of the action, renders an. erroneous judgment, and no appeal or error is prosecuted therefrom, and one of the parties accepts from the opposite party substantial sums of meny awarded by such judgment, and does not thereafter restore or tender restoration of the moneys so received, he is estopped in any collateral proceeding between the same parties from claiming the invalidity of that part of the judgment favorable to the opposite party.

Judgment reversed.

Hough, Wanamaker, Robinson, Jones, Matthias and Clark, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sanborn v. Sanborn, 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 134 (Ohio 1922).

1 Ohio Law. Abs. 134 (Sanborn v. Sanborn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.