Sanborn v. Sanborn

73 Mass. 142
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1856
StatusPublished

This text of 73 Mass. 142 (Sanborn v. Sanborn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sanborn v. Sanborn, 73 Mass. 142 (Mass. 1856).

Opinion

By the Court.

The master has found that the memorandum was not delivered as a binding agreement under the statute. The payment of the purchase money did not take the agreement out of the statute, especially as the master finds that it was not paid under or by virtue of that agreement. The court have therefore no jurisdiction of the bill in its present form. And we are of opinion that, after the reference of the case to a master, and the return of his report, fully stating the facts, it is now too late to permit the plaintiff, by amendment, to avail himself of a distinct head of equity jurisdiction, which had not been conferred on the court when the suit was brought.

Bill dismissed, without prejudice to a suit under St. 1855, c. 194.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 Mass. 142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanborn-v-sanborn-mass-1856.