Sanborn v. Keazer

30 Me. 457

Opinion

Wells, J. orally.

— Though there may have been a breach of the bond, on account of irregularity in organizing the justices’ Court, still if, in fact, they administered the oath, the case falls under the act of 1848, chap. 85. If the debtor had no property, the breach of the bond was of no damage to the creditor. In this case there was no property, and therefore no damage. Plaintiff nonsuit.