Sanborn v. Hamilton Cty. Budget Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Sanborn v. Hamilton Cty. Budget Comm.

2 N.E.3d 287, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1495

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 28, 2014

Docket2013-1598

StatusPublished

This text of 2 N.E.3d 287 (Sanborn v. Hamilton Cty. Budget Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sanborn v. Hamilton Cty. Budget Comm., 2 N.E.3d 287, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1495 (Ohio 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2010-938. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals.

Upon consideration of the motion for admission pro hac vice of Kelsey Hackem, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. XII(4), counsel shall file a notice of permission to appear pro hac vice with the Supreme Court’s Office of Attorney Services within 30 days of the date of this entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2010-938. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals.

Upon consideration of the motion for admission pro hac vice of Kelsey Hackem, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. XII(4), counsel shall file a notice of permission to appear pro hac vice with the Supreme Court’s Office of Attorney Services within 30 days of the date of this entry.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 N.E.3d 287, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanborn-v-hamilton-cty-budget-comm-ohio-2014.