Sanborn v. Dennis

75 Mass. 208
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1857
StatusPublished

This text of 75 Mass. 208 (Sanborn v. Dennis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sanborn v. Dennis, 75 Mass. 208 (Mass. 1857).

Opinion

By the Court.

The provision of St. 1853, c. 318, is explicit, that when a bill in equity for the redemption of a mortgage of real estate is inserted in a writ, the depositing of the writ or a copy thereof in the clerk’s office shall be deemed the commencement of the suit, unless it is so deposited within three days after service, and in that case the service shall be deemed the commencement of the suit.

As it is admitted in this case, that the service was made on the last day of the three years, and no copy of the writ was deposited in the clerk’s office within three days after that, the suit ■ was commenced too late.

The Sts. of 1855, c. 194, and 1856, c. 38, defining the general equity jurisdiction of this court, do not affect this specific provision of the St. of 1853, c. 316. They are not upon the same subject matter.

There is no evidence of any fraud, mistake or accident, to require the interposition of a court of equity.

Judgment for the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
75 Mass. 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanborn-v-dennis-mass-1857.