San v. Scherer
This text of 693 N.E.2d 805 (San v. Scherer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Franklin App. Nos. 97APE03-317 and 97APE03-318. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and cross-appeal. It appears from the records of this court that appellees/crossappellants have not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction of cross-appeal, due April 22,1998, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore have failed to prosecute [1402]*1402this cause with the requisite,diligence. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the cross-appeal of United Magazine Company and Ronald E. Scherer be, and hereby is, dismissed sua sponte.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
693 N.E.2d 805, 82 Ohio St. 3d 1401, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/san-v-scherer-ohio-1998.