San Pedro v. State

561 So. 2d 1163, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2079, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3967, 1988 WL 91207
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 6, 1988·No. No. 88-1575·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant seeks review of an upward departure from the sentencing guidelines. Both of the grounds1 relied upon below have since been held insufficient by determinative decisions of our supreme court. State v. Jones, 530 So.2d 53 (Fla.1988) invalidates the first basis for departure; State v. Hope, 529 So.2d 275 (Fla.1988) the second. Accordingly, the cause is remanded for resentencing within the guidelines.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

San Pedro v. State, 561 So. 2d 1163, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2079, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3967, 1988 WL 91207 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

561 So. 2d 1163 (San Pedro v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Breakstone v. MacKenzie
561 So. 2d 1163 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)