San Mateo Waterworks v. Sharpstein
50 Cal. 284, 1875 Cal. LEXIS 144
Opinion
The taking in this case amounts to a taking of private property for public use in the sense in which that phrase is used in the Constitution, and can only be effected upon the conditions prescribed in the Constitution—that is, upon just compensation being simultaneously made.
Order annulled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
San Mateo Waterworks v. Sharpstein, 50 Cal. 284, 1875 Cal. LEXIS 144 (Cal. 1875).
50 Cal. 284 (San Mateo Waterworks v. Sharpstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bank of America v. County of Los Angeles
270 Cal. App. 2d 165 (California Court of Appeal, 1969)
Howland v. Superior Court
16 P.2d 318 (California Court of Appeal, 1932)
Jacobsen v. Superior Court
219 P. 986 (California Supreme Court, 1923)
Vallejo & Northern Railroad v. Reed Orchard Co.
170 P. 426 (California Supreme Court, 1918)
Portneuf Irrigating Co. v. Budge
100 P. 1046 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1909)
Steinhart v. Superior Court
70 P. 629 (California Supreme Court, 1902)
Coburn v. Townsend
37 P. 202 (California Supreme Court, 1894)
Callahan v. Dunn
20 P. 737 (California Supreme Court, 1889)
Coburn v. Goodall
14 P. 190 (California Supreme Court, 1887)
Lamb v. Schottler
54 Cal. 319 (California Supreme Court, 1880)
Vilhac v. Stockton & Ione R.R.
53 Cal. 208 (California Supreme Court, 1878)
Efford v. S. Pac. Coast R.R.
52 Cal. 277 (California Supreme Court, 1877)
Sanborn v. Belden
51 Cal. 266 (California Supreme Court, 1876)