San Luis Obispo v. Smith

130 P. 858, 21 Cal. App. 55
California Court of Appeal·Decided January 28, 1913·No. Civ. No. 801.·Published

Opinion

No briefs have been filed herein. It appears, however, by a stipulation filed in this court on July 28, 1910, that the point involved, to wit: the constitutionality of an act of the legislature of the state of California entitled "An act to provide for the payment by the state, or counties, or cities, or cities and counties, of the premium or charge on official bonds when given by surety companies," approved March 25, 1903, [Stats. 1903, p. 476], is identical with the question presented in County of San Luis Obispo v. Murphy, 162 Cal. 588, [123 P. 808], wherein, by an opinion *Page 56 of the supreme court filed April 11, 1912, the said act was declared constitutional and valid. Upon the authority of that case and pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the judgment herein appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

San Luis Obispo v. Smith, 130 P. 858, 21 Cal. App. 55 (Cal. Ct. App. 1913).

130 P. 858 (San Luis Obispo v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

County of San Luis Obispo v. Murphy
123 P. 808 (California Supreme Court, 1912)