San Luis Obispo v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

San Luis Obispo v. Smith

130 P. 858, 21 Cal. App. 55

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedJanuary 28, 1913

DocketCiv. No. 801.

StatusPublished

This text of 130 P. 858 (San Luis Obispo v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

San Luis Obispo v. Smith, 130 P. 858, 21 Cal. App. 55 (Cal. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

No briefs have been filed herein. It appears, however, by a stipulation filed in this court on July 28, 1910, that the point involved, to wit: the constitutionality of an act of the legislature of the state of California entitled "An act to provide for the payment by the state, or counties, or cities, or cities and counties, of the premium or charge on official bonds when given by surety companies," approved March 25, 1903, [Stats. 1903, p. 476], is identical with the question presented in County of San Luis Obispo v. Murphy, 162 Cal. 588, [123 P. 808], wherein, by an opinion *Page 56 of the supreme court filed April 11, 1912, the said act was declared constitutional and valid. Upon the authority of that case and pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the judgment herein appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

No briefs have been filed herein. It appears, however, by a stipulation filed in this court on July 28, 1910, that the point involved, to wit: the constitutionality of an act of the legislature of the state of California entitled "An act to provide for the payment by the state, or counties, or cities, or cities and counties, of the premium or charge on official bonds when given by surety companies," approved March 25, 1903, [Stats. 1903, p. 476], is identical with the question presented in County of San Luis Obispo v. Murphy, 162 Cal. 588, [123 P. 808], wherein, by an opinion *Page 56 of the supreme court filed April 11, 1912, the said act was declared constitutional and valid. Upon the authority of that case and pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the judgment herein appealed from is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

130 P. 858, 21 Cal. App. 55, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/san-luis-obispo-v-smith-calctapp-1913.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack