San Lazaro Ass'n v. Connell
122 F. App'x 387
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in San Lazaro Ass'n v. Connell. Read the opinion of the Court — 286 F.3d 1088 →
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 2, 2005·No. No. 03-56164; D.C. No. CV-98-06216-RJK·Published
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
The District Court’s denial of Defendant-Appellant’s request for attorney’s [388]*388fees did not constitute an abuse of its discretion.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
San Lazaro Ass'n v. Connell, 122 F. App'x 387 (9th Cir. 2005).
122 F. App'x 387 (San Lazaro Ass'n v. Connell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.