San Jose Country Club v. Deloitte & Touche

907 So. 2d 619, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 11568, 2005 WL 1711763
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 25, 2005·No. No. 1D05-603·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner seeks certiorari review, challenging a pretrial order which it characterizes as a departure from the essential requirements of law. However, relief by certiorari also requires a showing of irreparable harm, based on error which could not be remedied on appeal after entry of a [620]*620final order. E.g., Jaye v. Royal Saxon, Inc., 720 So.2d 214 (Fla.1998). Such harm has not been shown here, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is therefore denied.

ALLEN, WOLF and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

San Jose Country Club v. Deloitte & Touche, 907 So. 2d 619, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 11568, 2005 WL 1711763 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

907 So. 2d 619 (San Jose Country Club v. Deloitte & Touche) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jaye v. Royal Saxon, Inc.
720 So. 2d 214 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)