San Joaquin Valley Securities Company v. Henry

California Court of Appeal

San Joaquin Valley Securities Company v. Henry

11 P.2d 48, 123 Cal. App. 771, 1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 951

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedMay 9, 1932

DocketDocket No. 377.

StatusPublished

This text of 11 P.2d 48 (San Joaquin Valley Securities Company v. Henry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

San Joaquin Valley Securities Company v. Henry, 11 P.2d 48, 123 Cal. App. 771, 1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 951 (Cal. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

All of the material facts in this case are essentially the same as those in San Joaquin Valley Securities Co. v. Prather,ante, p. 378 [11 P.2d 45], this day decided, except for a difference in names, dates and amounts. The cases were tried together, in conjunction with *Page 772 three other cases, and this appeal is from a judgment in favor of one of the defendants. While there is a separate appeal in each case, all five cases were submitted upon a single transcript and a single set of briefs.

[1] For the reasons given in San Joaquin Valley SecuritiesCo. v. Prather, supra, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Marks, J., and Jennings, J., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on June 6, 1932, and an application by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on July 7, 1932.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

All of the material facts in this case are essentially the same as those in San Joaquin Valley Securities Co. v. Prather,ante, p. 378 [11 P.2d 45], this day decided, except for a difference in names, dates and amounts. The cases were tried together, in conjunction with *Page 772 three other cases, and this appeal is from a judgment in favor of one of the defendants. While there is a separate appeal in each case, all five cases were submitted upon a single transcript and a single set of briefs.

[1] For the reasons given in San Joaquin Valley SecuritiesCo. v. Prather, supra, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Marks, J., and Jennings, J., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on June 6, 1932, and an application by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on July 7, 1932.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 P.2d 48, 123 Cal. App. 771, 1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 951, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/san-joaquin-valley-securities-company-v-henry-calctapp-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack