San Gabriel Valley Land & Water Co. v. Witmer Bros.

31 P. 588, 96 Cal. 623, 1892 Cal. LEXIS 998
California Supreme Court·Decided December 2, 1892·No. No. 14324·Published·Cited by 25 cases

Opinions

The Court.

— After ‘further consideration, we adhere to the opinion heretofore prepared by Commissioner Vanclief and adopted by the court at the former hearing, and for the reasons stated in that opinion, the judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.

McFarland, J., De Haven, J., Garoutte, J., Sharp-stein, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

San Gabriel Valley Land & Water Co. v. Witmer Bros., 31 P. 588, 96 Cal. 623, 1892 Cal. LEXIS 998 (Cal. 1892).

31 P. 588 (San Gabriel Valley Land & Water Co. v. Witmer Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

George F. Hazelwood Company v. Pitsenbarger
141 S.E.2d 314 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1965)
Riley v. Turpin
301 P.2d 834 (California Supreme Court, 1956)
Brandtjen & Kluge v. Fincher
44 Cal. App. Supp. 2d 939 (California Court of Appeal, 1941)
Brandtjen & Kluge, Inc. v. Fincher
44 Cal. App. 2d 939 (Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California, 1941)
People v. Mahoney
91 P.2d 1029 (California Supreme Court, 1939)
Mt. Tamalpais & Muir Woods Railway v. Johnson
37 P.2d 843 (California Court of Appeal, 1934)
Miller & Lux, Inc. v. Sparkman
17 P.2d 772 (California Court of Appeal, 1932)
E. E. McCalla Co. v. Sleeper
288 P. 146 (California Court of Appeal, 1930)
Corson v. Crocker
161 P. 287 (California Court of Appeal, 1916)
Finnell v. Finnell
114 P. 820 (California Supreme Court, 1911)
Bailey v. . Bishop
67 S.E. 968 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1910)
William Ede Co. v. Heywood
96 P. 81 (California Supreme Court, 1908)
City of Escondido v. Wohlford
94 P. 232 (California Supreme Court, 1908)
Henry v. Garden City Bank & Tr. Co. of San Jose
78 P. 228 (California Supreme Court, 1904)
Best v. Wohlford
78 P. 293 (California Supreme Court, 1904)
Anglo-Californian Bank, Ltd. v. Eudey
123 F. 39 (Ninth Circuit, 1903)
Kessler v. Kedzie
106 Ill. App. 1 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1903)
McPike v. Heaton
63 P. 179 (California Supreme Court, 1900)
County of Colusa v. County of Glenn
57 P. 477 (California Supreme Court, 1899)
Angus v. Plum
54 P. 97 (California Supreme Court, 1898)