San Gabriel v. United States

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion

April 5, 1996         [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]



                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT



                              _________________________



          No. 95-2228


MARIA SOCORRO DE SAN GABRIEL,



                                Plaintiff, Appellant,



                                          v.



                          UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL.,



                                Defendants, Appellees.



                              _________________________



                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT



                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO



                  [Hon. Salvador E. Cassellas, U.S. District Judge]
                                               ___________________



                              _________________________



                                        Before



                                Selya, Circuit Judge,
                                       _____________



                            Aldrich, Senior Circuit Judge,
                                     ____________________



                              and Stahl, Circuit Judge.
                                         _____________



                              _________________________



               Luis F. Abreu Elias for appellant.
               ___________________

               Guillermo   Gil,  United  States   Attorney,  and  Fidel  A.
               _______________                                    _________

          Sevillano  del   Rio,  Assistant  United  States   Attorney,  for
          ____________________

          appellees.



                              _________________________


_________________________



Per Curiam.  Upon careful examination of the record and
                    Per Curiam.
                    __________



          the  briefs in  this  matter, we  conclude  that the  plaintiff's



          appeal  is  meritless,  and  we therefore  summarily  affirm  the



          judgment of the district court.  See 1st Cir. R. 27.1.
                                           ___


Affirmed.  Costs to appellees.
                    Affirmed.  Costs to appellees.
                    ________   __________________


2