San Francisco Savings Union v. Long
56 P. 882, 6 Cal. Unrep. 278
Opinion
The motion to recall remittitur heretofore issued in this case is denied. It conforms to the judgment as rendered, and it is now too late to amend the judgment. The motion to amend our record nunc pro tunc, so as to show that the order made on the first day of November, 1898, was an order directing the amendment of the record by supplying the deficiency specified in. the plaintiff’s suggestion of diminution, is granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
San Francisco Savings Union v. Long, 56 P. 882, 6 Cal. Unrep. 278 (Cal. 1899).
56 P. 882 (San Francisco Savings Union v. Long) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.