San Francisco Savings Union v. Long

California Supreme Court

San Francisco Savings Union v. Long

56 P. 882, 6 Cal. Unrep. 278

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedApril 5, 1899

DocketS. F. No. 1041

StatusPublished

This text of 56 P. 882 (San Francisco Savings Union v. Long) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

San Francisco Savings Union v. Long, 56 P. 882, 6 Cal. Unrep. 278 (Cal. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The motion to recall remittitur heretofore issued in this case is denied. It conforms to the judgment as rendered, and it is now too late to amend the judgment. The motion to amend our record nunc pro tunc, so as to show that the order made on the first day of November, 1898, was an order directing the amendment of the record by supplying the deficiency specified in. the plaintiff’s suggestion of diminution, is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The motion to recall remittitur heretofore issued in this case is denied. It conforms to the judgment as rendered, and it is now too late to amend the judgment. The motion to amend our record nunc pro tunc, so as to show that the order made on the first day of November, 1898, was an order directing the amendment of the record by supplying the deficiency specified in. the plaintiff’s suggestion of diminution, is granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 P. 882, 6 Cal. Unrep. 278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/san-francisco-savings-union-v-long-cal-1899.