San Filippo v. Adler

278 A.D.2d 402, 717 N.Y.S.2d 365, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13274
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 18, 2000·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kangs County (Patterson, J.), dated February 1, 2000, which granted the motion of the defendant David Adler, and the separate motion of the defendants Jennifer Jacobson and Lutheran Medical Center, Inc., to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) on the ground that the action was barred by the doctrine of res judicata.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the motions are denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

The Supreme Court erred in dismissing the plaintiffs complaint on the ground that it was barred by the doctrine of res judicata. The dismissal of a prior action between the same parties for failure to prosecute is not a dismissal on the merits and does not bar a second action based upon the same facts “[u]nless the order specifies otherwise” (CPLR 3216 [a]; see, Gallo v Teplitz Tri-State Recycling, 254 AD2d 253; Struve v Bingham, 244 AD2d 178; Medalie v Jacobson, 120 AD2d 652; Lewin v Yedvarb, 61 AD2d 1025). O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, H. Miller and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

San Filippo v. Adler, 278 A.D.2d 402, 717 N.Y.S.2d 365, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13274 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

278 A.D.2d 402 (San Filippo v. Adler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ziegler v. Serrano
74 A.D.3d 1610 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Morales v. New York City Housing Authority
302 A.D.2d 571 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Mays v. Whitfield
282 A.D.2d 721 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)