San Filippo v. Adler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

San Filippo v. Adler

278 A.D.2d 402, 717 N.Y.S.2d 365, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13274

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 18, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 278 A.D.2d 402 (San Filippo v. Adler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

San Filippo v. Adler, 278 A.D.2d 402, 717 N.Y.S.2d 365, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13274 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kangs County (Patterson, J.), dated February 1, 2000, which granted the motion of the defendant David Adler, and the separate motion of the defendants Jennifer Jacobson and Lutheran Medical Center, Inc., to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) on the ground that the action was barred by the doctrine of res judicata.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the motions are denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

The Supreme Court erred in dismissing the plaintiffs complaint on the ground that it was barred by the doctrine of res judicata. The dismissal of a prior action between the same parties for failure to prosecute is not a dismissal on the merits and does not bar a second action based upon the same facts “[u]nless the order specifies otherwise” (CPLR 3216 [a]; see, Gallo v Teplitz Tri-State Recycling, 254 AD2d 253; Struve v Bingham, 244 AD2d 178; Medalie v Jacobson, 120 AD2d 652; Lewin v Yedvarb, 61 AD2d 1025). O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, H. Miller and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kangs County (Patterson, J.), dated February 1, 2000, which granted the motion of the defendant David Adler, and the separate motion of the defendants Jennifer Jacobson and Lutheran Medical Center, Inc., to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) on the ground that the action was barred by the doctrine of res judicata.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the motions are denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

The Supreme Court erred in dismissing the plaintiffs complaint on the ground that it was barred by the doctrine of res judicata. The dismissal of a prior action between the same parties for failure to prosecute is not a dismissal on the merits and does not bar a second action based upon the same facts “[u]nless the order specifies otherwise” (CPLR 3216 [a]; see, Gallo v Teplitz Tri-State Recycling, 254 AD2d 253; Struve v Bingham, 244 AD2d 178; Medalie v Jacobson, 120 AD2d 652; Lewin v Yedvarb, 61 AD2d 1025). O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, H. Miller and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

278 A.D.2d 402, 717 N.Y.S.2d 365, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/san-filippo-v-adler-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack